Skip to main content

François Boucher

Boucher Vulcan Presenting Venus with Arms for Aeneas
Vulcan Presenting Venus with Arms for Aeneas,1757

Born September 29th in 1703, the Master of the Rococo, François Boucher is the painter associated with warm skin tones, vivid cool backgrounds and clothing, and probably for the first time in art history, painting nude women for the sake of beauty and nothing else. In direct contrast to the dark realism of Caravaggio and the Baroque, Boucher is about art for art's sake, which irritated many of his critics, but his style is not as easy to categorize as we might think. Boucher's landscapes are idyllic and lush, providing a backdrop for his subjects, and yet he is among the first to really introduce a natural, erotic element to his women that seems innocent at the same time. Technically, Boucher was an incredible draftsman and he fully embraced every medium of his day, his influence carrying into the decorative arts also, such as porcelain and tapestry all throughout Europe. While he may have had less of an impact on art than others who came after him, I like Boucher's creativity and playful spirit.

In Vulcan Presenting Venus with Arms for Aeneas, Boucher creates a loose triangular composition filled with color and texture. Despite the seemingly casual arrangement of figures Boucher has actually put a lot of thought into this painting. The background forms a circular, dark frame around the figures, the left side airy and mysterious, with distant verdant landscapes, while the right side is rocky yet has both adult and baby angels. This seems to suggest a duality in the female and male, the Apollonian and Dionysian. However, Boucher couldn't help himself when it came to sexual innuendo: look at how Vulcan's sword is angled, like a giant phallic symbol that both Venus and her friend are definitely taking notice of. It's no coincidence that both of them are scantily clad in red flowing drapery. What is also curious is how Boucher has also paired all of the figures—except for Vulcan and the angel by his feet—and not only paired them, but he created a V-shape space between all of those figures. Boucher keeps our eye wandering round and round the entire painting by careful use of figure arrangement, framing and use of lighting effects to open up the sky and the area behind Vulcan to suggest fire. So much for art for art's sake.

Below are a sample of Boucher's beautiful drawings:

A Female Nude Reclining on a Chaise-Longue, c.1752

Resting Maiden, portrait of Marie-Louise O'Murphy (mistress of Louis XV of France),1751

Boucher captures both the innocence and sensuality of an attractive young girl who was one of the many "favourites" of the King. Such a painting even a hundred years earlier would have probably resulted in a huge scandal and big trouble from the Church, yet here it is as modern as anything today. Note how the warm tones of the chaise-longue and curtain complement her skin. The drawing above is a study for this painting, and Boucher changed very little in the pose as we can see here. It is an idyllic world that elevates rural life into poetry and fable. Boucher is all about pure fantasy.

François Boucher 007
The Bridge, 1751

Note how the use of repoussoir on the bottom frames the composition. Boucher uses atmospheric perspective to create the mood of this dreamy landscape which, although may not be completely accurate in general perspective, is expressive. The landscape itself is like a stage, and the trees are the subjects. Boucher's utopia is an idyllic pastoral moment, not bourgeois materialism, even though he painted much of that also. Here he uses oranges, yellows and greens with greys to make a soft mood that is captivating and peaceful.

Marquise de Pompadour,1756

The chief mistress of Louis XV, Jeanne Antoinette Poisson aka Madame De Pompadour, named after a region in France where the king gave her the estate and official title of Marquise. She has been painted by many artists but this version by Boucher, with his clever use of warm and cool colors that portrays her as an elegant and intelligent woman. The minute attention to the details of her dress is a testament to her reputation in the court and to King Louis XV, as such a portrait would have only been reserved for the most distinguished aristocracy. Despite her tiny shoes, Boucher creates a celebrity of her day, a personality that intrigues us and makes us want to know more about her.

Francois Boucher Heracles and Omphale
Heracles and Omphale,1735

An erotic theme of Greek Mythology that has been depicted as far back as the ancient Romans in Vesuvius and Pompeii, Omphale was a mistress of Heracles. Notice again the cherubs in V-shape formation. Boucher here creates a very passionate version (probably quite risqué even for its time) using both pink and red to visually underline the characters' lust and their gender. Take note of how the drapery covering his manhood neatly carries over her lap into her "area". In all of the paintings in the last five hundred years this may have been among the first to actually show a man and woman kissing passionately. One would expect there should have been a lot more. Boucher was a smart man.

Popular posts from this blog

More Old Master Drawings

There is nothing in all the world more beautiful or significant of the laws of the universe than the nude human body.
Robert Henri

Charles Louis Müller, A Standing Female Nude Leaning Against an Arch, ca.1864

Once again I decided to talk about some Old Master drawings and delve into the thinking behind how these drawings may have been created and the knowledge of the artist. In the above drawing by Müller, done in sanguine with white chalk highlights, the figure is drawn from a low view-point, with her body twisting toward her left side while resting on one knee. Note how Müller alternates the bent right leg with the bent left arm to create dynamic contrast. The right arm is also foreshortened and partially in shadow. Expressing power and femininity, this is a study that is Renaissance in spirit, even Mannerist, revealing the female nude as sculptural yet always graceful.

Anton Raphael Mengs, Seated male nude viewed from the back, 1755

One of several Academic nude studies by Mengs, this …

Guercino il Magnifico

Self-Portrait of the Artist holding a Palette, ca.1635

Giovanni Francesco Barbieri, known as Guercino was born on February 8, 1591 in Cento, a small city near Ferrara. He is one of the great masters of the Italian Baroque and poet of painters. Noted for his speed and efficiency, Guercino also worked in a number of mediums with equal passion whether ink, chalk, charcoal, or oils. His nickname, which means 'little cross-eyes' in Italian, derives in part from an apocryphal childhood accident where he supposedly awoke from a deep sleep as a child from a loud scream that caused his eyes to cross. Another story says something was thrown into his eyes. At any rate, he was self-taught as an artist from as early as nine years old and by his early teens was discovered by the eldest of the Carracci where he would spend some time at the Accademia Degli Incamminati before venturing out on his own. Despite his apparent 'handicap', his vision and talent would make him a giant that few…

Old Master Drawings

Drawing is not the form; it is the way of seeing the form.

A male nude from behind, c.1630 Gian Lorenzo Bernini

In this blog I talk about painting but the importance of drawing cannot be understated of course, and I believe we can learn just as much from studying their techniques of line and strokes as we can from brushstrokes...more in most cases as the drawing is more expressive and intimate. It reveals the personality and character of the artist.

The above drawing apparently comes from the period of Bernini's teaching at the Accademia di San Luca in Rome, one of four from the exact same model. This drawing is fairly big for a study, at 55.6 x 42cm (21 x 16 inches). Consider Michelangelo's study for Libyan Sibyl, is only 28.9 x 21.4 cm (11 3/8 x 8 7/16 inches), a small study for a fresco which would be painted several times larger than life size. I can only guess that Bernini was teaching a big class and that maybe his work was on display for students to study, or it ma…